Validity of Observer Ratings of the Big Five Personality Factors Academic Article

abstract

• The authors examined the validity of observer ratings (supervisor, coworker, and customer) and self-ratings of personality measures. Results based on a sample of 105 sales representatives supported the 2 hypotheses tested. First, supervisor, coworker, and customer ratings of the 2 job-relevant personality dimensions-conscientiousness and extraversion-were valid predictors of performance ratings, and the magnitude of the validities were at least as large as for self-ratings. Second, supervisor, coworker, and customer ratings accounted for significant variance in the criterion measure beyond self-ratings alone for the relevant dimensions. Overall, the results suggest that validities of personality measures based on self-assessments alone may underestimate the true validity of personality constructs.

authors

• Barrick, Murray

published proceedings

• Journal of Applied Psychology

altmetric score

• 1

author list (cited authors)

• Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P.

citation count

• 266

complete list of authors

• Mount, Michael K||Barrick, Murray R||Strauss, J Perkins

publication date

• January 1994

publisher

• American Psychological Association (APA)  Publisher

published in

• Journal of Applied Psychology  Journal

keywords

• 52 Psychology
• 5201 Applied And Developmental Psychology
• 5203 Clinical And Health Psychology
• 5205 Social And Personality Psychology
• Clinical Research

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

• 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.272

start page

• 272

end page

• 280

volume

• 79

issue

• 2

URL

• http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1037%2F0021-9010.79.2.272