Social Support for Breastfeeding in the Era of mHealth: A Content Analysis. Academic Article uri icon

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: Several barriers to successful breastfeeding exist, including a lack of support from peers or professionals. With the emergence of mobile health (mHealth) tools to provide additional breastfeeding support, a more thorough review of social support resources was needed. Research Aim: The aim of this study was to determine mHealth breastfeeding support resources and characterize the type of social support they provide. METHODS: A content analysis of mHealth programs ( n = 65), including text messaging ( n = 12) and mobile applications ( n = 53), was conducted on the basis of searches of the iTunes and Google Play stores ( n = 50) and PubMed, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, and American Business Information/INFORM Complete Plus ( n = 15). Results were then dual-coded for key characteristics and types of support provided. RESULTS: Thirty-eight apps (76%) were free to users, 14 (28%) were offered in a variety of languages, and 47 (94%) provided informational support. The mobile applications were targeted largely to postpartum women, focused on breastfeeding duration, and included troubleshooting information. Mobile applications often included media components ( n = 12 [24%]); few were tailored or personalized ( n = 5 [10%]) and interactive ( n = 15 [30%]). Text-messaging programs were available in a variety of countries ( n = 7 [58%]) and provided mostly informational support ( n = 5 [42%]), were pro-breastfeeding ( n = 12 [100%]), were targeted to both pregnant and postpartum women ( n = 6 [50%]), focused on both breastfeeding initiation and duration ( n = 9 [75%]), and had two-way interactivity ( n = 6 [50%]) and personalization ( n = 5 [42%]). CONCLUSIONS: Although freely available mobile applications and text-messaging programs exist, with potential for wide reach, the majority provide only informational support. These programs would benefit from additional study of their usefulness.

published proceedings

  • J Hum Lact

altmetric score

  • 0.5

author list (cited authors)

  • Schindler-Ruwisch, J. M., Roess, A., Robert, R. C., Napolitano, M. A., & Chiang, S.

citation count

  • 28

complete list of authors

  • Schindler-Ruwisch, Jennifer M||Roess, Amira||Robert, Rebecca C||Napolitano, Melissa A||Chiang, Shawn

publication date

  • August 2018