publication venue for
- A scoping review shows that no single existing risk of bias assessment tool considers all sources of bias for cross-sectional studies.. 111408-111408. 2024
- Reconciling contrasting guideline recommendations on red and processed meat for health outcomes.. 138:215-218. 2021
- Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group.. 135:42-53. 2021
- Minimal important difference estimates for patient-reported outcomes: A systematic survey.. 133:61-71. 2021
- GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.. 129:138-150. 2021
- Poor quality patient reported outcome measures bias effect estimates in orthopaedic randomized studies.. 116:36-38. 2019
- Using decision thresholds for ranking treatments in network meta-analysis results in more informative rankings.. 98:62-69. 2018
- GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence.. 87:14-22. 2017
- Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes andabsoluteeffect measures in systematic review abstracts.. 81:3-12. 2017
- Limited responsiveness related to the minimal important difference of patient-reported outcomes in rare diseases.. 79:10-21. 2016
- CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration.. 76:18-46. 2016
- Diverse criteria and methods are used to compare treatment effect estimates: a scoping review.. 75:29-39. 2016
- Although not consistently superior, the absolute approach to framing the minimally important difference has advantages over the relative approach.. 68:888-894. 2015
- Erratum to GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profilescontinuous outcomes [J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66(2):173-183]. 68:475-475. 2015
- Addressing continuous data measured with different instruments for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers.. 67:560-570. 2014
- The Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment screen correlated with the Standardized Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive section in clinical trials.. 67:87-92. 2014
- Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers.. 66:1014-1021.e1. 2013
- Combining follow-up and change data is valid in meta-analyses of continuous outcomes: a meta-epidemiological study.. 66:847-855. 2013
- Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis.. 66:286-295. 2013
- GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes.. 66:173-183. 2013
- New methods can extend the use of minimal important difference units in meta-analyses of continuous outcome measures.. 65:817-826. 2012
- Formatting modifications in GRADE evidence profiles improved guideline panelists comprehension and accessibility to information. A randomized trial.. 65:748-755. 2012
- Specific instructions for estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized trials were reliable and valid.. 65:262-267. 2012
- Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: built using item response theory.. 64:794-804. 2011
- The Internet is valid and reliable for child-report: an example using the Activities Scale for Kids (ASK) and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL).. 62:314-320. 2009
- Item response theory detected differential item functioning between healthy and ill children in quality-of-life measures.. 61:268-276. 2008
- The importance of work-up (verification) bias correction in assessing the accuracy of SPECT thallium-201 testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.. 49:735-742. 1996
- Causal language use in systematic reviews of observational studies is often inconsistent with intent: a systematic survey.. 148:65-73.
- Serious reporting deficiencies exist in minimal important difference studies: current state and suggestions for improvement.. 150:25-32.