Fulton, Sarah Associate Professor

academic article

• Fulton, S. A., & Dhima, K. (2020). The Gendered Politics of Congressional Elections. Political Behavior.  1-27.
  
• Ondercin, H. L., & Fulton, S. A. (2019). Bargain Shopping: How Candidate Sex Lowers the Cost of Voting. Politics & Gender.  1-27.
  
• Fulton, S. A., & Gershon, S. A. (2018). Too Liberal to Win? Race and Voter Perceptions of Candidate Ideology. American Politics Research.  46(5), 909-939.
  
• Fulton, S. A. (2014). When Gender Matters: Macro-dynamics and Micro-mechanisms. Political Behavior.  36(3), 605-630.
  
• Fulton, S. A., & Ondercin, H. L. (2013). Does Sex Encourage Commitment? The Impact of Candidate Choices on the Time-to-Decision. Political Behavior.  35(4), 665-686.
  
• Fulton, S. A. (2012). Running Backwards and in High Heels. Political Research Quarterly.  65(2), 303-314.
  
• Koch, M. T., & Fulton, S. A. (2011). In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies. JOURNAL OF POLITICS.  73(1), 1-16.
  
• Stone, W. J., Fulton, S. A., Maestas, C. D., & Maisel, L. S. (2010). Incumbency Reconsidered: Prospects, Strategic Retirement, and Incumbent Quality in U.S. House Elections. JOURNAL OF POLITICS.  72(1), 178-190.
  
• Fulton, S. A., Maestas, C. D., Maisel, L. S., & Stone, W. J. (2006). The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress. Political Research Quarterly.  59(2), 235-248.
  
• MAESTAS, C. D., FULTON, S., MAISEL, L. S., & STONE, W. J. (2006). When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW.  100(2), 195-208.