Field Experiences with Assisted and Automatic History Matching Using Streamline Models
Conference Paper
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
Other
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractReconciling high-resolution geologic models to production history is a very time-consuming process in reservoir modeling. Current practice still involves a tedious historymatching process that is highly subjective and often employs ad-hoc property multipliers. Recently streamline models have shown significant promise in improving the history matching process. In particular, the streamline-based "assisted historymatching" utilizes the streamline trajectories to identify and limit changes only to the regions contributing to the well production history. It is now a well-established procedure and has been applied successfully to numerous field cases.In this paper, we enhance the streamline-based assisted history matching in two important aspects that can significantly improve its efficiency and effectiveness. First, we utilize streamline-derived analytic sensitivities to determine the spatial distribution and magnitude of the changes needed to improve the history match. Second, we use a "generalized travel time inversion (GTTI)" for model updating via an iterative minimization procedure. Using this approach, we can account for the full coupling of the streamlines rather than changing individual or bundles of streamlines at a time. The approach is more akin to automatic history matching. However, by intervening at every step in the iterative model updating, we can retain control over the process as in assisted history matching. Our approach leads to significant savings in time and manpower during field-scale history matching.We demonstrate the power of our method using two field examples with model sizes ranging from 105 to 106 grid blocks and with over one hundred wells. The reservoir models include faults, aquifer support and several horizontal/high angle wells. History matching is performed using both assisted history matching and the GTTI. Whereas the general trends in permeability changes are similar for both the methods, the GTTI seems to significantly improve the water cut history matching on a well-by-well basis within a few iterations. Our experience indicates that the GTTI can also be used very effectively to improve the quality of history match derived from the assisted history matching. The changes to the reservoir model from GTTI are found reasonable with no artificial discontinuities or apparent loss of geologic realism.
