Estimating Reserves in Tight Gas Sands at HP/HT Reservoir Conditions: Use and Misuse of an Arps Decline Curve Methodology Conference Paper uri icon

abstract

  • Abstract This paper presents the results of a simulation study designed to evaluate the applicability of an Arps 1 decline curve methodology for assessing reserves in hydraulically-fractured wells completed in tight gas sands at high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) reservoir conditions. We simulated various reservoir and hydraulic-fracture properties to determine their impact on the production decline behavior as quantified by the Arps decline curve exponent, b. We then evaluated the simulated production with Arps' rate-time equations at specific time periods during the well's productive life and compared estimated reserves to the true value. To satisfy requirements for using Arps' models, all simulations were conducted using a specified constant bottomhole flowing pressure condition in the wellbore. Our study indicates that the largest error source is incorrect application of Arps' decline curves during either transient flow or the transitional period between the end of transient and onset of boundary-dominated flow. During both of these periods (principally the transient period), we observed b-exponents greater than one and corresponding reserve estimate errors exceeding 100 percent. The b-exponents generally approached values between 0.5 and 1.0 as flow conditions approached true boundary-dominated flow. Agreement be-tween Arps' suggested b-exponent range and our results using simulated performance data also indicates that, if applied under the correct conditions, the Arps rate-time models are appropriate for assessing reserves in tight gas sands at HP/HT reservoir conditions. Introduction Tight gas sands constitute a significant percentage of the domestic natural gas resource base and offer tremendous potential for future reserve and production growth. According to a recent study by the Gas Technology Institute (GTI),2 tight gas sands in the US comprise 69 percent of gas production from all unconventional natural gas resources and account for 19 percent of total gas production from both conventional and unconventional sources. The same study2 estimates total domestic producible tight gas sand resources exceed 600 Tcf, while economically recoverable gas reserves are 185 Tcf. Most of the resources assessed in the 2001 GTI study were at depths less than 15,000 ft, yet the natural gas industry continues to extend exploration and development activities to much greater depths. In some geologic basins, those depths are approaching 20,000 to 25,000 ft. Many of these deep natural gas resources are not only characterized by low-permeability, low-porosity reservoir properties, but these reservoirs also exhibit abnormally high initial pore pressure and temperature gradients—i.e. high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) reservoir conditions. Similar to conventional natural gas resources, tight gas sand reserves are routinely assessed with Arps' decline curve techniques. The original Arps1 paper suggested the decline curve exponent, b, should fall between 0 and 1.0 on a semilog plot. However, we often observe values much greater than 1.0, particularly in tight gas sands at HP/HT reservoir conditions. Deviations in observed b-exponents from the expected range suggest Arps' rate-time relationships may not be valid for modeling the decline behavior of tight gas sands at HP/HT conditions. More importantly, inappropriate use of the Arps models may cause significant reserve estimate errors in these unconventional natural gas resources.

name of conference

  • SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition

published proceedings

  • All Days

author list (cited authors)

  • Rushing, J. A., Perego, A. D., Sullivan, R., & Blasingame, T. A

complete list of authors

  • Rushing, Jay Alan||Perego, Albert Duane||Sullivan, Richard||Blasingame, Thomas Alwin

publication date

  • January 1, 2011 11:11 AM

publisher

  • SPE  Publisher