Factors related to partner involvement in Development of the US National Physical activity plan
Academic Article
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
Other
View All
Overview
abstract
CONTEXT:: Physical activity coalitions are increasingly forming to meet the demands associated with policy, systems, and environmental change necessary to realize increases in population levels of physical activity. Little is known about what makes physical activity coalitions successful; however, evidence from community-based coalitions in other public health domains suggests that factors related to each organization that joins a coalition may explain coalition success or failure. OBJECTIVE:: The objective of this study was to employ qualitative methods to understand the factors related to organizations' decisions to join and remain committed to the coalition that developed and launched the US National Physical Activity Plan (NPAP). DESIGN/SETTING:: Qualitative semistructured phone interviews were conducted with key informants from the NPAP coalition's partner organizations. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded separately by members of the research team. PARTICIPANTS:: Fourteen individuals representing 13 NPAP partner organizations participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Analysis focused on key factors explaining why and how partner organizations decided to join and remain committed to the NPAP coalition. RESULTS:: Five primary factors emerged: (1) strategic alignment, (2) organizational alignment, (3) provide input, (4) seminal event, and (5) cost/benefit ratio. CONCLUSIONS:: Building and maintaining a physical activity coalition with highly committed partners may hinge upon the ability to fully understand how each current or prospective partner perceives it could benefit from strategic alignment with the coalition, aligning with other organizations involved with the coalition, having input with the coalition's activities, participating in important events and products of the coalition, and realizing more overall advantages than disadvantages for participating in the coalition. 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
