Editing Early Modern Women's Manuscripts: Theory, Electronic Editions, and the Accidental Copy-Text Academic Article uri icon

abstract

  • AbstractBoth the content and the physical nature of early modern womens manuscript texts frequently raise significant issues for editors which are not addressed by either classical editorial theory set forth by Greg, Bowers, and Tanselle or the current principles and practices of editing manuscripts as historical documents. Eeditions or electronic editions would appear to be the solution, but current marketdriven models of electronic editions and archives also have several important but little examined premises about what types of texts are suitable for such projects that are problematic when working with many early modern womens manuscript texts.This article is part of a Literature Compass special issue on Scholarly Editing in the TwentyFirst Century.The special issue is made up of the following pieces:Special Issue: Scholarly Editing in the TwentyFirst Century Preface, Regenia Gagnier, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 3334, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00672.x.Special Issue: Scholarly Editing in the TwentyFirst Century Introduction, Arthur F. Marotti, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 3536, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00673.x.Electronic Archives and Critical Editing, Jerome McGann, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 3742, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00674.x.Theorizing the Digital Scholarly Edition, Hans Walter Gabler, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 4356, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00675.x.Editing Without Walls, Peter Robinson, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 5761, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00676.x.Our Affection for Books, Susan J. Wolfson, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 6271, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00677.x.His Days Among the Dead Are No Longer Passed: Editing Robert Southey, Lynda Pratt, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 7281, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00678.x.Different Demands, Different Priorities: Electronic and Print Editions, Stuart Curran, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 8288, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00679.x.Editing Manuscripts in Print and Digital Forms, Arthur F. Marotti, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 8994, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00680.x.All of the Above: The Importance of Multiple Editions of Renaissance Manuscripts, Steven W. May, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 95101, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00681.x.Editing Early Modern Womens Manuscripts: Theory, Electronic Editions, and the Accidental CopyText, Margaret J.M. Ezell, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 102109, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00682.x.Different Strokes, Same Folk: Designing the Multiform Digital Edition, Daniel Paul ODonnell, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 110119, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00683.x.Special Issue: Scholarly Editing in the TwentyFirst Century A Conclusion, Laura Mandell, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 120133, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00684.x.Special Issue: Scholarly Editing in the TwentyFirst Century Combined Bibliography, Marotti et al., Literature Compass 7.2 (2010): 134144, doi: 10.1111/j.17414113.2009.00685.x.

published proceedings

  • LITERATURE COMPASS

altmetric score

  • 0.5

author list (cited authors)

  • Ezell, M.

citation count

  • 15

complete list of authors

  • Ezell, Margaret JM

publication date

  • February 2010

publisher