Metascience: Guidelines for the Practitioner uri icon

abstract

  • The Problem The trend in current research is to seek a statistically significant finding, one that provides a p value less than a predetermined alpha. Unfortunately, a large number of research studies have been identified as being nonreplicable along with having other shortcomings (low power, improper methodology, poor sample size) that reduce the rigor of a studys research findings. Additional techniques are needed beyond relying solely on a p value. The Solution This article presents recommendations that Human Resource Development (HRD) scholars and scholar-practitioners can implement to improve the rigor of the disciplines research and practice. This article also provides guidelines (higher power, meta-analyses, low bias in large studies) of how to best avoid producing nonreplicability studies along with recommendations for the larger field, in this instance for scholars and scholar-practitioners in the social sciences. The Stakeholders Scholars, scholar-practitioners, employees, and researchers who are impacted by changes in their environment due to less-than rigorous evidence-based research findings.

published proceedings

  • Advances in Developing Human Resources

author list (cited authors)

  • Turner, J. R., Brown, H. Q., Passmore, D. L., Nimon, K., Baker, R., Jeong, S., & Flatt, C.

complete list of authors

  • Turner, John R||Brown, H Quincy||Passmore, David L||Nimon, Kim||Baker, Rose||Jeong, Shinhee||Flatt, Candace