Lattice Boltzmann solidification modeling of forced convection internal flows applied to Gen-IV nuclear reactor coolants
Academic Article
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
Other
View All
Overview
abstract
Generation-IV nuclear reactors involve novel coolants such as molten salts and lead. One of the issues that must be assessed with these coolants is the risk of solidification during reactor operation owing to their high melting temperature. However, the numerical simulation of solidification problems is computationally demanding. In this work, we assess the applicability of Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) to nuclear coolants solidification problems under laminar internal forced flow conditions. The double distribution Total Enthalpy-Partially Saturated Method is implemented in the open-source code OpenLB and compared against more standard Finite-Volume Computational Fluid Dynamics (FV-CFD) results, which uses the enthalpy-porosity Eulerian Multiphase method, in commercial code Star-CCM+. The test cases comprise the solidification of two fluids with significantly different Prandtl numbers, molten salt and lead, in a 3D pipe geometry in laminar flow conditions with an initial Reynolds number of 100. The solid interface advances from the cooled wall towards the bulk of the pipe reducing the area of flow passage as the transient evolves. Results of LBM velocity fields, solid fraction profiles, temperature fields, and pressure fields are in good agreement with FV-CFD results for both coolants. Furthermore, LBM stability and accuracy limits are independently explored for molten salts and lead using Two-Relaxation Time (TRT) and Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) collision operators. Simulation time between FV-CFD and LBM is also contrasted for both coolants. In this work, LBM solvers use explicit time schemes with a regular grid, whereas FV-CFD solutions are able to include implicit time schemes and near-wall mesh refinement. For molten salt flows (high Prandtl number) FV-CFD allows for considerably larger timesteps than LBM, which is limited by the maximum lattice Mach number limitation and stability considerations. For lead flows (low Prandtl number), the implicit scheme in FV-CFD is limited in terms of accuracy for large timesteps due to the limiting Fourier-number. On the other hand, LBM does not present notable stability issues for lead and the lattice Mach number limit is not as relevant as for the molten salt case for this Reynolds number, allowing for faster simulation times than FV-CFD.
