Youth sport parents familiarity and perceptions of concussion legislation
Academic Article
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
Other
View All
Overview
abstract
Objectives In an effort to reduce the negative health consequences often associated with concussions among young athletes, all U.S. states and the District of Columbia enacted youth concussion legislation between 2009 and 2014. This study explored youth sport parents (1) familiarity with their state's concussion legislation, and (2) perceptions about the need for additional legislative provisions not currently found in such laws. Methods Cross-sectional online survey data were obtained from parents ( n=430) of youth sport athletes from 22 U.S states. Results Primary findings suggest that 67% of parents were moderately to extremely familiar with the removal from play requirement; 69.9% were moderately to extremely familiar with mandatory concussion training for coaches; and 75.1% were moderately to extremely familiar with the medical clearance requirement for athletes to return to play. In regard to perceptions, approximately half (50.2%) believed it is essential to mandate parent/guardian notification when a child suffers a potential concussion; and 42.8% believed it is essential to include a penalty/sanction for violating the statute. Based on the results of a multivariable logistic regression model, a significantly greater familiarity of concussion legislation was found among parents who were White/Caucasian, had advanced degrees, had higher household incomes, or were urban residents. Conclusions Our findings suggest that most youth sport parents have a sound understanding of concussion legislation and believe that the laws should be revised to improve best practices in preventing and managing concussions. Parents who face socio-cultural and economic barriers can benefit most from having access to credible information about their state's concussion law.
