Improved assessment of Schistosoma community infection through data resampling methodology
Institutional Repository Document
Overview
Research
Identity
Other
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractIntroductionThe conventional diagnostic forSchistosoma mansoniinfection is stool microscopy with Kato-Katz technique to detect eggs. Its outcomes are highly variable on day-to-day basis, and may lead to biased estimates of community infection used to inform public health programs. Our goal is to develop a resampling methodology that leverages data from a large-scale randomized trial to accurately predict community infection.MethodsWe developed a resampling methodology that provides unbiased community estimates of prevalence, intensity and other statistics forS. mansoniinfection when a community survey is conducted using single Kato-Katz stool microscopy per host. It leverages a large-scale dataset, collected in the SCORE project, and allows linking single-stool community screening to its putative multi-day true statistics.ResultsSCORE data analysis reveals limited sensitivity of Kato-Katz stool microscopy, and systematic bias of single-day community testing vs. multi-day testing; for prevalence estimate, it can fall up to 50% below true value. The proposed SCORE-cluster methodology reduces systematic bias and brings estimated prevalence values within 5-10% of the true value. This holds for a broad swath of transmission settings, including SCORE communities, and other datasets.DiscussionOur SCORE-cluster methodology can markedly improve theS. mansoniprevalence estimate in settings using stool microscopy.
