Primary and secondary ice production: interactions and their relative importance
Academic Article
Overview
Identity
Additional Document Info
Other
View All
Overview
abstract
Abstract. A discrepancy of up to 5orders of magnitude between ice crystal and ice nucleating particle(INP) number concentrations was found in the measurements, indicating the potentially important role of secondary ice production(SIP) in the clouds. However, the interactions between primary and SIP processes and their relative importance remain unexplored. In this study, we implemented five different ice nucleation schemes as well as physical representations of SIP processes (i.e., droplet shattering during rain freezing, ice-ice collisional break-up, and rime splintering) in the Community Earth System Model version 2(CESM2). We ran CESM2 in the single column mode for model comparisons with the DOE Atmospheric Radiation Measurement(ARM) Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment(M-PACE) observations. We found that the model experiments with aerosol-aware ice nucleation schemes and SIP processes yield the best simulation results for the M-PACE single-layer mixed-phase clouds. We further investigated the relative importance of ice nucleation and SIP to ice number and cloud phase as well as interactions between ice nucleation and SIP in the M-PACE single-layer mixed-phase clouds. Our results show that SIP contributes 80% to the total ice formation and transforms 30% of pure liquid-phase clouds simulated in the model experiments without considering SIP into mixed-phase clouds. The SIP is not only a result of ice crystals produced from ice nucleation, but also competes with the ice nucleation by reducing the number concentrations of cloud droplets and cloud-borne dust INPs. Conversely, strong ice nucleation also suppresses SIP by glaciating mixed-phase clouds and thereby reducing the amount of precipitation particles(rain and graupel).
