Feasibility of wearable physical activity monitors in cancer patients (PAMCaP). Academic Article uri icon

abstract

  • 6577 Background: Wearable physical activity monitors (PAMs) provide a degree of functional assessment not possible with prior clinical instruments. Subjective assessments of functional status are prone to inaccuracy and current objective assessment techniques are limited to the research setting. The relevance of physical activity monitors (PAMs) to measure functional status in cancer patients is unclear. The feasibility of using these devices in cancer patients is not known. Methods: This is a prospective pilot trial of a commercially available PAM in cancer patients. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2 receiving systemic therapy at an NCI Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center were enrolled. (NCT02583815). The primary objective was to determine feasibility of PAM use, defined as device use of more than 50% of the study observation period. Secondary objectives were to correlate PAM-reported measures: median, minimum and maximum steps/day, minutes of activity/day, (light/ fairly active/ very active); with 1) clinician assessed ECOG PS and 2) quality of life tool scores (FACT-G, QIDS, PQSI and BFI). Patient experience with wearable PAMs was assessed at the end of study. Results: We enrolled 32 patients: median age = 56 years (range 23-72), female = 67%, and white = 78%. Most patients had gastrointestinal (52%) and breast (19%) primaries. Clinician assessed PS was ECOG 0 in 56%, 1 in 37% and 2 in 7%. Majority of patients (81%) met the primary end point. Mean PAM measured steps for ECOG 0 was 5911 steps/d, ECOG 1 was 1890 steps/d and ECOG 2 was 845 steps/d (p = 0.002). Minimum steps/day correlated with BFI (r = -0.56, p < .01), FACT-G (r = 0.45, p 0.01) and QIDS (no vs mild vs moderate depression, p 0.01). Patients reported a positive experience with the devices (74%). Conclusions: Wearable PAMs are a feasible tool to measure physical activity in cancer patients receiving systemic therapy. PAM derived measures correlate with clinician assessments of performance status. Future work should develop methods to systematically incorporate PAMs in oncology clinical trials and practice. Clinical trial information: NCT02583815.

published proceedings

  • JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

altmetric score

  • 0.5

author list (cited authors)

  • Beg, M. S., Stewart, T., Gupta, A., Dong, Y., Rahimi, Z., Paul, T., Crane, K., & Rethorst, C.

citation count

  • 1

complete list of authors

  • Beg, Muhammad Shaalan||Stewart, Tyler||Gupta, Arjun||Dong, Ying||Rahimi, Zain||Paul, Tony||Crane, Kimberli||Rethorst, Chad

publication date

  • May 2017