Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation
Overview
Identity
Additional Document Info
Other
View All
Overview
abstract
This chapter situates Guba and Lincolns chapter within the broad philosophical debate about the justifiability of interpretations. The emergence of a new paradigm of inquiry (naturalistic) has, unsurprisingly enough, led to a demand for rigorous criteria that meet traditional standards of inquiry. Two sets are suggested, one of which, the trustworthiness criteria, parallels conventional criteria, while the second, " authenticity criteria, is implied directly by new paradigm assumptions. 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.