Determining statistical significance between e-learning training versus traditional training in six different industry settings

This research analyzes performance of participants' from six mid-western industries located in the United States. The research design of this study used a pre-test/post-test control group design and a randomized sampling technique in six industry settings. The treatment group was instructed using the e-learning method while the control group was taught using the traditional face-to-face teaching method. Both groups were taught with the same content and instructor. From the industries, 262 employees were enrolled in the study comparing e-learning with traditional training methods. Of the 262 participants, 168 (64 per cent) completed the study. Results of the study on trainee performance revealed that instruction made a difference in the performance of both groups, yet there were no statistically significant differences in mean performance scores between the e-learning and the traditional group.

Determining statistical significance between e-learning training versus traditional training in six different industry settings Academic Article