n296959SE Academic Article uri icon


  • 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. The authors regret that the numbers on the abscissa in Fig. 13 were incorrectly labeled. As a result, the threshold stress values reported were inaccurate in the abstract and Section 3.6. The corrected Fig. 13 is displayed below. The threshold stresses for alloy Q2 are 9.2 and 9 MPa for the peak- and over-aged conditions, respectively, whereas the threshold stresses for alloy Q1 are 9 MPa for the peak-aged specimen and 10 MPa for the over-aged one. These corrections do not affect the conclusions reached as a result of this research. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused. [Figure presented] Fig. 13. Creep properties of alloys Q1 and Q2 under compressive stresses at 400 C for peak-aged (350 C/16h + 400 C/12 h) or over-aged (350 C/16h + 450 C/24 h) conditions. Creep data of a similar alloy (Al-0.01Er-0.05Sc-0.06Zr-0.03Si) was also plotted for comparison purposes [9].

published proceedings

  • Acta Materialia

author list (cited authors)

  • Erdeniz, D., Nasim, W., Malik, J., Yost, A. R., Park, S., De Luca, A., ... Dunand, D. C.

publication date

  • January 1, 2017 11:11 AM