National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Survey of carcass characteristics through instrument grading assessments Academic Article uri icon


  • 2017 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. The instrument grading assessment portion of the National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA) 2016 allows the unique opportunity to evaluate beef carcass traits over the course of a year. One week of instrument grading data was collected each month from 5 beef processing corporations encompassing 18 facilities from January 2016 through December 2016 (n = 4,544,635 carcasses). Mean USDA yield grade (YG) was 3.1 with 1.37 cm fat thickness (FT), 88.9 cm2 LM area, 393.6 kg HCW, and 2.1% KPH. Frequency distribution of USDA YG was 9.5% YG 1, 34.6% YG 2, 38.8% YG 3, 14.6% YG 4, and 2.5% YG 5. Increases in HCW and FT since the NBQA2011 were major contributors to differences in mean YG and the (numerically) increased frequency of YG 3, 4, and 5 carcasses found in the current audit. Mean marbling score was Small75, and the distribution of USDA quality grades was 4.2% Prime, 71.4% Choice, 21.7% Select, and 2.7% other. Frequency of carcasses grading Prime on Monday (6.43%) was numerically higher than the average frequency of carcasses grading Prime overall (4.2%). Monthly HCW means were 397.6 kg in January, 397.2 kg in February, 396.5 kg in March, 389.3 kg in April, 384.8 kg in May, 385.0 kg in June, 386.1 kg in July, 394.1 kg in August, 399.1 kg in September, 403.9 kg in October, 406.5 kg in November, and 401.9 kg in December. Monthly mean marbling scores were Small73 in January, Small80 in February, Small81 in March, Small77 in April, Small70 in May, Small67 in June, Small70 in July, Small75 in August, Small74 in September, Small76 in October, Small80 in November, and Small79 in December. Both mean HCW and mean marbling score declined in the months of May and June. The month with the greatest numerical frequency of dark cutters was October (0.74%). Comparison of overall data from in-plant carcass and instrument grading assessments revealed close alignment of information, especially for YG (3.1 for in-plant assessment versus 3.1 for instrument grading) and marbling (Small70 for in-plant assessment versus Small75 for instrument grading). These findings allow the beef industry access to the greatest volume of beef valuedetermining characteristics for the U.S. fed steer and heifer population than ever reported, resulting in potentially more precise targeting of future quality and consistency efforts.

published proceedings


altmetric score

  • 8.08

author list (cited authors)

  • Boykin, C. A., Eastwood, L. C., Harris, M. K., Hale, D. S., Kerth, C. R., Griffin, D. B., ... Savell, J. W.

citation count

  • 6

complete list of authors

  • Boykin, CA||Eastwood, LC||Harris, MK||Hale, DS||Kerth, CR||Griffin, DB||Arnold, AN||Hasty, JD||Belk, KE||Woerner, DR||Delmore, RJ Jr||Martin, JN||VanOverbeke, DL||Mafi, GG||Pfeiffer, MM||Lawrence, TE||McEvers, TJ||Schmidt, TB||Maddock, RJ||Johnson, DD||Carr, CC||Scheffler, JM||Pringle, TD||Stelzleni, AM||Gottlieb, J||Savell, JW

publication date

  • July 2017