On Psychological Identity and Training: A Reply to Thomas and Chan (2000)
- Additional Document Info
- View All
K. R. Thomas and F. Chan (2000) raised several concerns about the legitimacy and primacy of the Boulder model in the training of rehabilitation psychologists, particularly with regard to the unique needs and history of rehabilitation psychology. We address several of the issues they raise and maintain that the utility of the Boulder model, although in need of some revision to meet the evolving nature of health care service delivery systems, remains the most appropriate model for the training of professional psychologists.
author list (cited authors)
Wegener, S. T., Elliott, T. R., & Hagglund, K. J.