Effects of functional oils and monensin on cattle finishing programs11This experiment was supported by Oligo Basics USA LLC, Wilmington, DE.
Academic Article
Overview
Identity
Additional Document Info
Other
View All
Overview
abstract
2013 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. The use of functional oils (FO; Essential) and ionophores on cattle feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and economic analysis was evaluated. Angus and Angus crossbred steers were assigned to 5 treatments: control (CON); monensin (MON); monensin + FO low dosage (MON+FL); FO low dosage (FL); and FO high dosage (FH; n = 48/ treatment; 6/rep). Daily DMI was not affected (P > 0.05) by FO, and MON improved ADG and G:F when compared with FL and FH (P < 0.05). Dressing percentage for the FH treatment was larger than for MON and FL (P < 0.05). Longissimus muscle area of FH cattle was the largest of all treatments and differed from that of MON (P < 0.05). Backfat thickness was not different (P > 0.05) among treatments. Cattle on the MON+FL treatment yielded the best cutability and differed from MON (P < 0.05). Quality grade was not different (P > 0.05) among treatments. Diets with FO increased the percentage of Choice and Prime carcasses, and FH yielded the largest percentage of Prime grade carcasses, differing from CON and MON+FL (P < 0.05) but not from MON and FL (P > 0.05). Sensory panel evaluations were unaffected by treatments (P > 0.05). Using actual costs and prices, profitability was numerically highest for MON+FL. In annual and seasonal price scenarios, profitability favored FH. Carcass price provided the greatest effect on profitability. Thus, the use of FO may provide a viable alternative to ionophores in feedlot cattle.
