Evaluating single-case research data: A comparison of seven statistical methods
Academic Article
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
Other
View All
Overview
abstract
This study examined and compared the performances of seven popular or promising techniques for analyzing between-phase differences in single-case research designs. The techniques are: (a) Owen White's binomial test on extended Phase A baseline (White & Haring, 1980), (b) D. M. White, Rusch, Kazdin, and Hartmann's Last Treatment Day technique (1989), (c) Gorsuch's "trend analysis effect size" (Faith, Allison, & Gorman, 1996; Gorsuch, 1983), (d) Center's mean-only and mean-plus-trend models (Center, Skiba, & Casey, 1985-1986), and (e) Allison's mean-only and mean-plus-trend models (Allison & Gorman, 1993; Faith et al., 1996). The techniques were assayed by applying them to a set of 50 single-case AB design (baseline and intervention) data sets, constructed to represent a range of type and degree of intervention effects. From analysis of these 50 data sets, four questions were answered about the analytic techniques: (a) How much statistical power is possessed by the more promising techniques? (b) What typical R 2 effect sizes are evidenced for graphed data sets which, according to visual analysis, show a positive intervention effect? (c) How do the five analytic techniques covary with one another? and (d) To what extent does each technique tend to produce autocorrelated residuals?