Judgmental adjustment of earnings forecasts Academic Article uri icon


  • Earnings forecasts have received a great deal of attention, much of which has centered on the comparative accuracy of judgmental and objective forecasting methods. Recently, studies have focused on the use of combinations of subjective and objective forecasts to improve forecast accuracy. This research offers an extension on this theme by subjectively modifying an objective forecast. Specifically, ARIMA forecasts are judgmentally adjusted by analysts using a structured approach based on Saaty's (1980) analytic hierarchy process. The results show that the accuracy of the unadjusted objective forecasts can be improved when judgmentally adjusted. Copyright 1990 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

published proceedings

  • Journal of Forecasting

author list (cited authors)

  • Wolfe, C., & Flores, B.

citation count

  • 54

publication date

  • January 1990