Intercomparison of the GOS approach, superposition T-matrix method, and laboratory measurements for black carbon optical properties during aging Academic Article uri icon

abstract

  • 2016 Elsevier Ltd We perform a comprehensive intercomparison of the geometric-optics surface-wave (GOS) approach, the superposition T-matrix method, and laboratory measurements for optical properties of fresh and coated/aged black carbon (BC) particles with complex structures. GOS and T-matrix calculations capture the measured optical (i.e., extinction, absorption, and scattering) cross sections of fresh BC aggregates, with 520% differences depending on particle size. We find that the T-matrix results tend to be lower than the measurements, due to uncertainty in theoretical approximations of realistic BC structures, particle property measurements, and numerical computations in the method. On the contrary, the GOS results are higher than the measurements (hence the T-matrix results) for BC radii <100nm, because of computational uncertainty for small particles, while the discrepancy substantially reduces to 10% for radii >100nm. We find good agreement (differences <5%) between the two methods in asymmetry factors for various BC sizes and aggregating structures. For aged BC particles coated with sulfuric acid, GOS and T-matrix results closely match laboratory measurements of optical cross sections. Sensitivity calculations show that differences between the two methods in optical cross sections vary with coating structures for radii <100nm, while differences decrease to ~10% for radii >100nm. We find small deviations (10%) in asymmetry factors computed from the two methods for most BC coating structures and sizes, but several complex structures have 1030% differences. This study provides the foundation for downstream application of the GOS approach in radiative transfer and climate studies.

published proceedings

  • JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER

author list (cited authors)

  • He, C., Takano, Y., Liou, K., Yang, P., Li, Q., & Mackowski, D. W.

citation count

  • 37

complete list of authors

  • He, Cenlin||Takano, Yoshi||Liou, Kuo-Nan||Yang, Ping||Li, Qinbin||Mackowski, Daniel W

publication date

  • November 2016