Determination of Fe3+/Fe using the electron microprobe: A calibration for amphiboles Academic Article uri icon

abstract

  • Iron is a common constituent in minerals from the Earth's crust and upper mantle and often occurs in minerals as mixtures of two valence states, Fe3+or Fe2+. Quantification of the values of Fe3+/FeTotal, where FeTotal= Fe3++Fe2+, in minerals may be necessary to accurately apply certain mineral equilibria to determine equilibrium values of important variables such as temperature (T), pressure (P), and oxygen fugacity (fO2). Most useful would be an analytical technique that permits determination of values of Fe3+/FeTotalwithin a single mineral grain that is contained within a standard petrographic thin section, and the excellent spatial resolution and relative accessibility of the electron microprobe (EMP) have resulted in various attempts to use this instrument to determine values of Fe3+/FeTotal. These efforts have typically involved quantifying characteristics of the FeL and/or FeL peaks. In this paper, we employ the method of Fialin et al. (2001), who have shown that the location of the FeL peak changes as a function of Fe content and values of Fe3+/FeTotal, to determine values of Fe3+/FeTotalin amphiboles. We have characterized the FeL peak in several amphiboles with known values of Fe3+/FeTotalusing the electron microprobe at Texas A&M University. Initial analyses employed a beam current of 20 nA in an effort to avoid Fe-oxidation due to electron beam generated H-loss (Wagner et al. 2008). Subsequent analyses were conducted at 100 nA, and the results are consistent with the 20 nA data only when relatively short duration analytical times were used. The position of the FeL peak was determined for three suites of amphiboles that have been experimentally treated such that grains in any one of these mineral suites are chemically identical except for differences in the values of Fe3+/FeTotal. A linear relation between the FeL peak location and value of Fe3+/FeTotalwas observed for each of these three amphibole suites. These three lines differ from one another in both their slope and intercept and these differences vary as a function of Fe content. Thus, these amphiboles served as the basis for the derivation of a relation between Fe content and FeL peak location, both measured with the EMP, and the value of Fe3+/FeTotalas originally determined with57Fe Mssbauer spectroscopy. The relation between the relative peak position (RPP = hematite standard FeL peak position - amphibole FeL peak position), Fe content, and Fe3+/FeTotalis Fe3+/FeTotal= RPP - RPP(0)/RPP(1) - RPP(0), where RPP(0) = -1.37 FeO2+ 19.59 FeO - 3.85, RPP(1) = -1.25 FeO2+ 21.39 FeO + 13.05, and FeO refers to the wt%FeO. This relation reproduces the measured values of Fe3+/FeTotalto within 0.07 and, therefore, should permit determination values of Fe3+/FeTotalin amphiboles with Fe contents from 7 to 13 wt% FeO with similar precision. The amphiboles that were used in this study were kaersutites, Ti-bearing pargasites, and pargasitic hornblendes. The calibration presented here should, at the very least, be applicable to amphiboles with similar compositions, and although further verification is necessary, this calibration may be useful for determining values of Fe3+/FeTotalin amphiboles with distinctly different compositions and may even be more universally applicable.

published proceedings

  • AMERICAN MINERALOGIST

author list (cited authors)

  • Lamb, W. M., Guillemette, R., Popp, R. K., Fritz, S. J., & Chmiel, G. J.

citation count

  • 18

complete list of authors

  • Lamb, William M||Guillemette, Renald||Popp, Robert K||Fritz, Steven J||Chmiel, Gregory J

publication date

  • May 2012