Humanism and Empire: Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini, Cicero and the imperial ideal* uri icon

abstract

  • ABSTRACTThe paper argues that theDe ortu et auctoritate imperii Romaniof Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini (1446) has been unjustifiably ignored by historians ofquattrocentohumanist political thought simply because of its adherence to the ideal of universal imperial government. At present, whenDe ortuis addressed at all, it is considered merely as an anachronistic product of a medieval mentality. It is shown, however, that Aeneas, by working within a demonstrably Ciceronian framework, actually articulates a philosophically coherent defence of a single universal empire by exploiting a conceptual ambiguity in Cicero's own presentation of the foundations of social and political association. Aeneas suggests that Cicero's account of the communal nature of human beings, so far from sanctioning republican civic institutions, actually justifies the imposition of universal empire. A study of Piccolomini's political thought thus points to a greater diversity within the political viewpoints associated with humanism than current scholarship on the subject acknowledges. Moreover, it reveals the level of philosophical sophistication to which renaissance defences of empire could aspire.

published proceedings

  • The Historical Journal

author list (cited authors)

  • Nederman, C. J.

citation count

  • 5

complete list of authors

  • Nederman, Cary J

publication date

  • September 1993